<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Data Value Talk &#187; Budget</title>
	<atom:link href="http://datavaluetalk.com/tag/budget/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://datavaluetalk.com</link>
	<description>Customer data is a valuable asset. Why not treat it that way?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 14:49:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>nl</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Budget for Data Quality seems no problem</title>
		<link>http://datavaluetalk.com/data-quality/budget-for-data-quality-seems-no-problem/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=budget-for-data-quality-seems-no-problem</link>
		<comments>http://datavaluetalk.com/data-quality/budget-for-data-quality-seems-no-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emile van de Klok</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datavaluetalk.wordpress.com/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A survey of Human Inference in 2008 indicates that processes are the biggest experienced challenge in relation to Data Quality. However the subject that seems to be no problem is the budget. Human inference differentiates itself by interpretation of knowledge. So from this perspective I wonder how the respondents interpreted the word &#8220;processes&#8221;. Do they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mceTemp">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Myriad Pro;">A survey of Human Inference in 2008 indicates that processes are the biggest experienced challenge in relation to <a title="data quality" href="http://www.humaninference.com" target="_blank">Data Quality</a>. However the subject that seems to be no problem is the budget. Human inference differentiates itself by interpretation of knowledge. So from this perspective I wonder how the respondents interpreted the word &#8220;processes&#8221;. Do they mean the processes within the value chain of their companies or do they actually mean the process of obtaining a budget for Data Quality? The latter would actually explain a lot.</span></p>
</div>
<div id="attachment_75" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://datavaluetalk.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/survey-challenge-dq.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-75" title="survey-challenge-dq" src="http://datavaluetalk.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/survey-challenge-dq.jpg?w=300" alt="HI Survey Results" width="300" height="188" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">HI Survey Results</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://datavaluetalk.com/data-quality/budget-for-data-quality-seems-no-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

