<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toponymic confusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://datavaluetalk.com/2009/02/13/toponymic-confusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://datavaluetalk.com/data-quality/toponymic-confusion/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=toponymic-confusion</link>
	<description>Customer data is a valuable asset. Why not treat it that way?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:47:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Data Value Talk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Toponymic confusion revisited</title>
		<link>http://datavaluetalk.com/data-quality/toponymic-confusion/#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>Data Value Talk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Toponymic confusion revisited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 14:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datavaluetalk.com/?p=664#comment-652</guid>
		<description>[...] But different spelling of geographical items will eventually lead to toponymic confusion (see my blogpost earlier this year).  Apparently, the inhabitants of Webster call the  lake  &#8220;Lake [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But different spelling of geographical items will eventually lead to toponymic confusion (see my blogpost earlier this year).  Apparently, the inhabitants of Webster call the  lake  &#8220;Lake [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Biddle</title>
		<link>http://datavaluetalk.com/data-quality/toponymic-confusion/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Biddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datavaluetalk.com/?p=664#comment-57</guid>
		<description>And what to think of Hungary, which the Hungarians call: Magyarország. Can it be more different? And Finland that Finlanders call: Suomi. Last example: Bhutan in their language is: Druk Yul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what to think of Hungary, which the Hungarians call: Magyarország. Can it be more different? And Finland that Finlanders call: Suomi. Last example: Bhutan in their language is: Druk Yul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Rhind</title>
		<link>http://datavaluetalk.com/data-quality/toponymic-confusion/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Rhind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datavaluetalk.com/?p=664#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Just to be picky, Holger, Peking did not change its name - what changed was the transliteration of the Chinese name, Beijing being a better representation of the Mandarin pronunciation of the city name than Peking.

Not only does nobody in Macedonia use the FYROM nomenclature, be prepared for a storm of disapproval if you do when in Macedonia!  Macedonians distinguish their state from historic Macedonia by calling it &quot;Republic of Macedonia&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to be picky, Holger, Peking did not change its name &#8211; what changed was the transliteration of the Chinese name, Beijing being a better representation of the Mandarin pronunciation of the city name than Peking.</p>
<p>Not only does nobody in Macedonia use the FYROM nomenclature, be prepared for a storm of disapproval if you do when in Macedonia!  Macedonians distinguish their state from historic Macedonia by calling it &#8220;Republic of Macedonia&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

