<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The obfuscated address contest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://datavaluetalk.com/2008/11/23/the-obfuscated-address-contest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://datavaluetalk.com/data-quality/the-obfuscated-address-contest/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-obfuscated-address-contest</link>
	<description>Customer data is a valuable asset. Why not treat it that way?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:47:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil van den Berg</title>
		<link>http://datavaluetalk.com/data-quality/the-obfuscated-address-contest/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Emil van den Berg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 15:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datavaluetalk.com/?p=208#comment-19</guid>
		<description>You are right, Pim; I changed the text accordingly.
Thanks for close reading :-)

Greets,
Emil van den Berg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right, Pim; I changed the text accordingly.<br />
Thanks for close reading :-)</p>
<p>Greets,<br />
Emil van den Berg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pim Hermans</title>
		<link>http://datavaluetalk.com/data-quality/the-obfuscated-address-contest/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Pim Hermans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datavaluetalk.com/?p=208#comment-16</guid>
		<description>In general nice examples but there are some textual errors:

The second street matches clearly better; this can only be determined if the errors in the second case are considered more severe than the errors in the second case

Two times the &quot;second case&quot; is used. Seems to be incorrect.

Gr,

Pim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In general nice examples but there are some textual errors:</p>
<p>The second street matches clearly better; this can only be determined if the errors in the second case are considered more severe than the errors in the second case</p>
<p>Two times the &#8220;second case&#8221; is used. Seems to be incorrect.</p>
<p>Gr,</p>
<p>Pim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

